X-Men: Genesis

Longbox Graveyard #160

X-Men: Apocalypse arrives in theaters this week, and while reviews have been mixed, there’s no denying that the X-Men have become a major movie franchise, with a half-dozen films so far, and plenty more on the way. It’s hard to believe these many movies began with a single comic series published by Marvel a half-century ago!

Uncanny X-Men #1

I recently re-read the first several issues of X-Men, and it was fascinating to see where and how this modern franchise was born. In celebration of the X-Men’s pending Apocalypse, I thought it would be fun to look at the team’s Genesis, in terms of the major mutant tropes that emerged in the earliest days of the X-Men!

Now, I have a confession to make. Despite my love of all things Marvel, I’ve never been a huge X-Men fan, and I’ve considered the earliest run of the book among the lesser works of Stan Lee and Jack Kirby. It had been several years since I read this book, and I went into my re-read expecting unsophisticated stories and a lot of growing pains as the X-Men formula gradually took shape.

What surprised me was how much of the modern X-Men storytelling DNA was baked into this series right from the start. And the most magical moment of all was when the most important element of the X-Men ethos flowered into full life in issue #5.

But that’s getting ahead of myself …

The concept of mutant student/heroes was on display right from the start. From the first page of issue #1, class was in session!

X-Men #1, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

And “class,” for the most part, meant the Danger Room … though it wasn’t called by that name quite yet.

X-Men #1, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

Some of the X-Men’s personalities were also on early display. Scott Summers was already a humorless hall monitor. The Beast, conversely, was initially a rough-and-tumble thuggish type … but more about him in a moment.

X-Men #1, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

The X-Men were united in their admiration of the school’s newest pupil — Jean Grey. Maybe not quite united — Bobby Drake, the Iceman, was vocal in his disinterest. I’m certain Stan Lee and Jack Kirby didn’t mean for this to be more than an adolescent male expressing that girls are icky … but given that Bobby has come out as gay in recent Marvel continuity, this makes for an interesting footnote.

X-Men #1, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

Most important, this first issue laid the groundwork for the core element of the X-Men mythos — that mutants are different than humans, and feared by them.

X-Men #1, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

And mutants are feared with good reason! That’s right, there are evil mutants, too … And right on cue, we get a gloriously deranged Magneto, ranting about Homo Superior.

X-Men #1, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

Our heroes put Magneto to flight, which earns them the appreciation of the Army. While hinted at earlier, that critical element of the X-Men — that society hates all mutants, good or evil, just for being mutants — hasn’t quite coalesced yet.

X-Men #1, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

Issue #2 further wedded the X-Men with the mainstream. Cyclops and Iceman received the kind of welcome normally reserved for the likes of the Fantastic Four …

X-Men #2, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

And Professor X was working directly with the F.B.I. to capture the Vanisher, communicating via some high-tech telepathic gizmo. (It might be easier to use the phone next time, Chuck!)

X-Men #2, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

But there was one bit of X-Men lore that got well and truly locked in this issue — the Danger Room got its name!

X-Men #2, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

Issue #3 saw the X-Men’s mission of reaching out to the world’s mutants start to come into focus, though the way Professor X was shown to do it was kind of creepy.

X-Men #3, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

The Mutant-Of-The-Month was the Blob. It was amusing that Professor X had no “Plan B” if someone had the temerity of turning down an invitation to the X-Men. Someone might take a dim view of risking his neck in the Danger Room and getting bossed around by Scott Summers? Inconceivable!

X-Men #3, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

The Blob clearly wasn’t X-Men material. That he used his newfound status to try to take over a circus speaks volumes … and also serves to underscore the emerging good-mutants-versus-bad-mutants theme taking root in the book.

X-Men #3, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

This issue also saw the Beast reinterpreted as educated and sophisticated. In Son of Origins, Stan Lee wrote this change was because the original, rough-hewn Beast seemed too much like The Thing, from the Fantastic Four. And so the Beast started using big words and reading an advanced calculus book with his feet!

X-Men #3, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

Issue #3 also introduced a pervy subplot where Professor X secretly pined for the teenage Jean Grey … but we will just pretend this never happened …

X-Men #3, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

Issue #4 featured the return of Magneto, now in command of the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants! Chief among Magneto’s crew were Quicksilver and the Scarlet Witch — pretty much the odd-mutants-out in Magneto’s Brotherhood, and destined to to respond to the better angels of their natures and become heroes after an issue or two. But they did provide the perfect audience for Magneto to blast off again about the secret mutant war that was becoming the heart of the book.

X-Men #4, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

That plot line continued into Issue #5, where there was a subtle change that really defined what made the X-Men special …

X-Men #5, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

Did you catch it?

“Normal humans fear and distrust anyone with super-mutant powers! … If he’s a fellow mutant, we’ve got to help him! … We’ve got to help anyone who’s in trouble! That’s our oath!”

The friendly men-on-the-street and allied authority figures of the first few issues have given way to an ugly mob that turns against mutants because they are different … while the X-Men emerge as heroes who look out for their own kind, but also defend anyone who is in trouble, even the people who hate them.

With these two panels, the X-Men are well and truly born. The idea that our heroes were mutants, and that they were students in a school, did help to set the book apart right from the start — but these were external elements, and over time they would have been little more than gimmicks. By providing the X-Men with the internal dynamic of being hated by the outside world while still pledging to serve the common good — well, that’s a concept that could (and did!) sustain these heroes for decades to come.

Suddenly, X-Men was more than a superhero fist opera. It was a battle for hearts and minds! And the stakes couldn’t be higher, because that battle was fought inside the team itself — like in issue #8, where Beast stormed off the team after being set-upon by a bigoted mob.

X-Men #8, Stan Lee & Jack Kirby

“I think Magneto and his evil mutants are right!”

That’s an argument we’ve been having in X-Men to this day.

This is interesting stuff! Our four-color world is suddenly cast in shades of grey. And while it would still be a decade before the X-Men as we know them today really came together …

Giant-Size X-Men #1

… you can still trace the genesis of this beloved Marvel super-team to those first, at-times-awkward issues by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby. Was there anything those two guys couldn’t do?

And has there ever been a longer-gestating comic book hit than the X-Men? The book was ten years in the wilderness before it turned into a phenomenon with that new team, above — ten years where the series flirted with cancellation, and was even a reprint book for a time. The reintroduction of the X-Men under Len Wein and Dave Cockrum (and Chris Claremont, who took the ball and ran with it) was pitch-perfect, using the core ideas and history of series as a jumping-off point, and introducing a colorful and (mostly) new cast of characters that connected with the audience in ways the originals never quite managed.

Given Marvel’s nature — and the necessity of keeping those trademarks fresh — I expect the X-Men would have continued to get times at bat even if the 1974 series had fizzled, but that would have been no guarantee of success. How many times has Marvel tried (and failed) to make us fall in love with the Inhumans? Deathlok, Blade, Ghost Rider … every couple years, these characters get a chance to seize the spotlight, but they’ve never pulled it off, certainly not to the degree the X-Men have enjoyed. In terms of unlikely success, I expect only the Guardians of the Galaxy rank higher in Marvel’s oeuvre, and while the Guardians used a clever comics reboot as a springboard for their success, that property has really been more of a movie phenomenon than a comic book success.

Anyway, it just goes to show that sometimes it take awhile to get it right … and that you can’t rush success. The idea and the moment have to meet, and even then, you need a lot of luck. But hope springs eternal, and one of the pleasures of being a comics fan is watching a tertiary book like X-Men or the Guardians turn into a runaway success. It’s the kind of thing that inspires collectors to hang on to even their most obscure comic books — you never know when some lame old first issue is going to turn into solid gold.

(And personally, I’m keeping my fingers crossed for the Invaders, Son of Satan, and the Legion of Monsters!)

NEXT MONTH: #161 The Superman Novels of Elliot S! Maggin



About Paul O'Connor

Revelations and retro-reviews from a world where it is always 1978, published every now and then at www.longboxgraveyard.com!

Posted on May 25, 2016, in Conspectus and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 14 Comments.

  1. word_in_edgewise

    Always fun getting your take on the classics, bub. 😎


  2. Alastair Savage

    You have to admire Lee and Kirby’s persistence with apparently failing characters. The same thing paid off with the Hulk too, and that book’s double launch.


    • You’d think Marvel would have had an itchy trigger finger in those days — I think Marvel was contractually restrict from publishing more than a set number of books per month, owing to their distribution agreement, so if something wasn’t working, there was that much more incentive to replace it with another book. A different time, to be sure. (I expect it also took MONTHS for Marvel to piece together actual sales data on their books, so they got a lot of rope).


  3. There are some very interesting things to note in those early issues, as you pointed out. I’d re-read these a few years ago, but had forgotten much of it, so thanks for refreshing my memory.

    Also, didn’t X-Men actually get cancelled briefly in the late 60’s?


    • It wasn’t cancelled, but it did become a reprint book with issues #67-93, starting in 1970.

      It was a funky approach but I kind of liked the reprint books. When I first got into comics in the mid-seventies, it was all new to me, and reprint books like Marvel Tales and (at that time) X-Men helped me connect even more deeply with the characters. It was a little confusing but nothing twelve-year-old me couldn’t puzzle out. I’d like to see that tradition come back — would it be such a terrible thing for the Fantastic Four to be a reprint book right now?

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I would say that there is at least one thing Lee and Kirby couldn’t do: make compelling X-Men stories. This issues – and subsequent Werner Roth issues – are largely awful and unreadable. It wasn’t until Neal Adams and Roy Thomas came along that this book showed ANY potential, and then obviously, Claremont.

    These early issues include the most one-dimensional Jean Grey of all-time, a damsel in distress at every turn, and some of the worst villains in Marvel history:

    1. Grotesk, the Sub-Human: I’m surprised he hasn’t been retconned to be a part of the Morlocks, since he was a subterranean, and probably is a terrible first choice to make this argument, because he did have potential

    2. The Locust: he controls…locusts

    3. El Tigre/Kukulcan: treasure hunter turned Aztec god… TANGENT: I recently read that the original pitch for Giant Size X-Men was that the original 5 would be revered as Aztec gods, with a new team out to take them down/rescue them

    4. Factor Three: Possibly the worst cabal in the history of secret agendas. SPOILER ALERT: the leader is an octopus from space; You also have The Ogre, a generic man in a generic purple leotard, as well as The Changeling, who at least had some redeeming value (retconned as impersonating Prof X; inspired the character of Morph)

    5. Lucifer: Not the devil. Another alien. Also, another villain in red clothes with a purple cape, following in the footsteps of Magneto and the Vanisher

    These are just off the top of my head. There was a guy in a green and orange armor whose name escapes me, maybe issue #36, and of course, who can forget the Cobalt Man? Sweet melons…

    As for Iceman, its amazing that throughout X-history, there are A LOT of these innocuous comments that, given the current state of things, can be seen as, “Hmm… is he gay?” It wasn’t until I stumbled across a few of those instances that I accepted it as something other than another ham-fisted way to retcon special interest groups into comics. (I have no problems with diversity in comics – or anywhere – but shoehorning it into long-established characters is just pandering. I am now firmly on the side of the fence that thinks the Iceman turn is NOT pandering at all, and an actual, logical evolution of the character.)


    • Mekano is the guy in green and orange armor that you’re thinking of. I think he had en exoskeleton granting him super strength.

      Agreed that, for the most part, the X-Men stories are pretty weak until Thomas/Adams, but there’s the occasional story that I do like. Issue #1 is way better than Avengers #1, as far as I’m concerned, though I am glad that Stan the Man changed Hank from a Thing knockoff into a pedantic preachy (“violence is the last refuge of the incompetent”) mutant that we all know and love.

      I also thought that the first Juggernaut story, with the buildup to this awesome, unknown (to us and Prof X’s students, anyway) foe, and the first Mimic story were both pretty good. I also seem to vaguely recall that an early Sentinal story was pretty good. But yes, certainly more misses than hits in the early years. Good thing this title hung on for a few years through the tough times so that it could give us some later classics!

      Liked by 1 person

      • You’re right. I was a little unfair, because I omitted the things I did like about those early tales. The debuts of Juggernaut and the Sentinels were definitely highlights of the Silver Age X-Men.

        I’ll also say that as a child of the 80s, my first exposure to comics and the way stories were told was wildly different from the books in print in 1963, so that also skews my opinion somewhat.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Yeah, I got my start in about 1975-76, and some of the Silver Age stuff doesn’t thrill me, either, so I know what you mean.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Oh, and by the way, thanks. Mekano is indeed who I meant. I believe he was never seen again.

            Liked by 1 person

            • For my part, I was thrilled to see Lucifer pop up in my re-read. He featured in the very first comic book I ever read (a mid-seventies Captain America), and I never knew what the heck he was about. After reading him in X-Men … I still don’t know what the heck he is about, but it was running into an old school chum on the street. Plus that particular issue has Professor X exploring caves on his own in a mechanical wheelchair — it is gloriously deranged.


  1. Pingback: “U” Is For … | Longbox Graveyard

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: